Welcome to Brazil!

Brazil is a paradise. It has over three thousand kilometers of exuberant tropical beaches, beautiful landscapes and a very pleasant weather. It offers some of the greatest outdoor experiences with one of the world's richest wildlife diversity. All that wrapped up in one of the world's cheapest tourist hot-spots.

Furthermore, Brazilians are among the most hospitable people. Every foreigner is very well treated, everyone stops to help any non-Hispanic tourist in the street. Hispanics don't attract much attention, because Brazilians hate argentines, but cannot tell them apart from any other Spanish-speaking people.

One of the most important tourist attraction in the country is prostitution. Here you can find such service to satisfy any perverted cravings. The typical treats are the ‘mulata’ (black women) and children of all ages and genders. If it pleases the foreign tourist, and if he can afford it, he can even molest babies – rape, maim and murder whomever you wish! As long as you hire the right people, especially those with the right connections in government, you don't even get fined for littering after you're done.

At this point, the eager client must be thinking "this can't be right, for so much fun there must be a catch", but apart from going to hell, there isn't any! Nobody get's arrested, you don't wake up to see your face in any newspaper or any such inconveniences. Actually, these kind of things never show up in any newspaper, because it's such a profitable business, no government official would allow any news company to ruin such a goldmine – moneywise I mean.

The best time for the foreign tourist to come visit the country, for sexual tourism, is in the week of Carnaval. Although every single movie that is filmed in Brazil has a carnival, it really only happens one week per year. Carnaval, by the way, used to be a religious festival throughout the catholic world, but in this supposedly catholic country, carnival is really a good time to worship the anti-Christ, since it really resembles a typical day in Gomorra.

Brazil has a tendency to idolize a single character for every great thing. For example the architect that revived prehistoric buildings design, inspired by the pyramids and the Minotaur's dungeons - Oscar Niemeyer - is considered a God here. In the same manner, a midget pimp called 'Joãozinho 30' (Johnnie 30) is the man responsible for transforming the Carnaval into the world's biggest whorehouse.

After this great success, Johnnie 30 decided to become a new Christian, in order to get support to go into politics. It is wonderful to see the likely career advances he made step by step in very morally-compatible fields of interest - bum, world-class pimp, new Christian, politician and then back to bum. Everybody loves him, but not as much as all the clandestine joints that he made possible. Thus, when a satisfied client spanks-silly a four-year-old he just raped, he should pay homage to this guy, who made Satan's dreams come true.

Still, do not fear, Brazil's sexual-tourism isn't only restricted to Carnaval. The country has also become the true Mecca for all homosexual gatherings. Every gay movement has been held either in São Paulo or Rio de Janeiro, including special gay-carnaval setups. While in other countries the locals seem offended by such behavior, after every pro-homosexual event more and more youth find their way in someone else’s asses. Imagine the possibilities the 2014 World Cup holds.

It seems that the barbaric Brazilian tribe is culturally oriented towards homosexualism, since it is not only passing laws that oblige its citizens to welcome fags into their lives, but its government is also handing out pro-homosexual books and propaganda in public elementary schools. The probable reason would be for poor children to better receive the international sexual tourist, there is no other logical explanation.

Instead of any moral-bound group manifesting the atrocity of irreversibly damaging young minds, the media supports this idea, and every soap opera today must have a gay couple, regardless if it has anything to do with the story. The truth is that there are no heterosexual men in this country, none that would find strange that their sons were sleeping over more often with their buddies, with their teachers and with their next door neighbors.

Every time someone gets run over, shot, stabbed, raped, burnt, etc., there is something on the news,  you can tell it's already common saturated stuff - nobody cares anymore. On the other hand, if somebody stated in public to be against the gay propaganda, to feel uncomfortable to witness children being incentivized to take up the cause, the gay cause, he gets immediately crucified as being a Nazi, a 'racist', an imbecile and sick motherfucker.

Although there are laws that suggest this to be a free country, that trick its citizens into believing they have a right to an opinion, not even a congressman is allowed to suggest he'd like his children to be straight. If he does commit this stupidity - speaking his mind - the whole country's press goes after him and he can kiss his career goodbye.

For legal purposes, I must state that I'm being very sarcastic in this one.

I felt urged to write on these matters, because I find both youth prostitution and pro homosexual propaganda oriented to children to be the pinnacle of an immoral society. Children are strictly learners, you cannot expect them to behave like adults, you cannot expose them to sex before they are ever ready for it - I'd suppose not until they're allowed to drink or drive a car - but the immoral government thinks otherwise. Unfortunately, it is up to them and they are proving they think 10-year olds are ready to go and get butt-f_cked.

Did they ask any father if it was right to do so, was there a popular vote? Not at all, some perverted and homosexual government officials made such a terrible, immoral and unwise decision, merely pressured by the gay community. The reason seems obvious – true gays are, by definition, sterile. If they have sterile sex and sterile matrimonies, how can they ever conceive children? Would they truly care for children? Their answer lays in their actions, by exposing these young minds to perverted ideas and behaviors.

I think I should express my clear position about homosexualism, balanced to today's laws. I think it's utterly wrong, but I don’t go about treating them bad, just the same way I don’t spend my time insulting rapists, drug addicts or serial killers. Note that there aren't yet laws that prevent us from offending such fine people as there are for offending homosexuals, although homosexual behavior is just as wrong as the others.

Just what behavior is that? All three are derived from faulty mental and emotional dysfunctions. All of them are based on people trying to be something they aren't, escaping from their reality. All of them are linked to psychological violence – usually self-inflicted. All of them go contrary to basic human moral standards and family values. All of them cause undeniable shame, regardless of what they tell themselves.

Back to my position, I affirm that I would never have any sort of relationship with homosexuals (friendly or otherwise), as I wouldn't with drug addicts. I could care less what our hypocrisy-based societies think of me or my opinion. As long as I don’t harm them or offend them, I believe to be in my moral right, regardless if more homosexuals take up government seats to pass more immoral and censoring laws.

The other day I watched a pathetic interview with a transformer that's become a Brazilian celebrity of late (remember I said Brazilians are all homosexuals? That's also because they get equally aroused by a beautiful woman as would by a produced transvestite). All the time, it kept correcting its interviewer, when he would refer to its surgery as being a sex-change operation, the self-lying transvestite would correct the reporter by saying "sexual adjustment" or “spiritual adjustment” (lol), but leaving no possibility for its true term. Either you accept their own language and excuses to what they justify their fantasy world, or you're considered “male chauvinistic pig”!

According to that transvestite, its surgery to remove a useless penis, and transform the fissure into a false-vagina, was a sexual or spiritual adjustment, because it was fitting the body to the soul. What a false and lame story! There is no adjustment! They try hard to make it seem that there is a greater power responsible for their own actions and choices.

The excuse that becoming a fag is related to biology is unacceptable, so is to fate or to some gruesome divine power. They never say the truth, that it’s about their own selfish desires, about their cowardice to accept who and what they are. There is no god of fags, or any biological acceptable reason to become a homosexual. What happens is that homosexuals seek out any excuse to justify their own faults by putting the blame on some greater power.

The first reason I wouldn't have any sort of contact with homosexuals is to avoid getting prosecuted for speaking my mind, which eventually would happen. My opinions aren't what they'd like to hear, but with a lot of wishful thinking, it should be everybody's right to discuss any matter with plausible arguments, with concrete ideas to back them up.

For starters I don't hate anybody. I am not prejudicial for emotional reasons. If I have a minimal prejudice against blacks, Muslims or ETs, based on statistical foundations. Not because it has become illegal to be racist, that I'll take a stranger to my house, into the family I am responsible for protecting.

As a true humanist, I wish this homosexual propaganda to end. It isn't my place to prevent an individual from turning to the dark force. If someone wants to kill himself, I can't do anything about it except offer my help to discuss such idea and try to convince him otherwise - but if he still wants to do it, eventually he will, I couldn't ever stop him. Such is my position towards the homosexual individual, his choice is his own.

But, on a collective humanist view, I am strongly against homosexualism. For humanity's sake, people are becoming too selfish, only living for themselves, rather, only living for their pleasures. The traditional family foundation is about sharing, about finding an inner generosity to share a life with another person, and bringing forth from that more life. As homosexualism stands against the family, I stand against homosexuality.

But still, regarding homosexuality versus humanity, there is reason to believe it may even be a solution for survival. As human population increases, our host planet has lost its natural balance, it’s losing its power to provide food and shelter for everyone. It seems this too fits an agenda of the world government.

I can understand why governments and world press have joined hands to promote this issue. It's clearly the only way to slow down world population growth. The more people turn, less children are born, thus slowing down overpopulation. This lesson comes from China, were its government has tried over almost 50 years to control its population, imposing a limit to one child per couple. For all those years, the result is a 100 to 1 male-female population.

At first this seemed to them a bad thing, since Chinese men risk going about their lives without ever having even a girlfriend. But today, China holds the world's largest homosexual population, and childbirth has virtually come to a halt to one-hundredth of what it would have been.

Just to point out the anti-humanist reason this occurred, I'd like to add that the one-child limitation hides an atrocity. It became common practice, although officially illegal, to murder female newborn babies to have the slot vacant for a boy. It happens that in their culture, retired parents are taken in by their sons, while the spouse's parents must look out for themselves. For self preservation, parents hardly gave up their limit-token for a girl, whom would eventually end up taking care of her husband's parents.

As I said earlier, I can understand the ruling system's investment in a social disease to control population growth, but I still don’t agree with it. As a species, if we cannot survive by maintaining our inherited moral behavior, then I feel we do not deserve to survive. If we cannot save our planet, thus saving ourselves, why bother tricking our society into being saved by a perverse scheme?

Don’t fool yourself that the system hasn't tried other schemes before. How many diseases have appeared that were engineered in a laboratory? Aids and Ebola are considered by many to be two clever products of evil minds, and so are drugs - come on, you don't think governments wouldn’t stop distribution if they really wanted to? Why do you think cigarettes are still in market, after being proven to be extremely harmful - tobacco isn't as bad as the 4700 chemical substances added to them. What happened to the old-un-tampered cigarettes?

The Fountain - Explained

It came to my attention, very recently, that there are people out there that share my admiration for the film "The Fountain", but there are also many comments from people that say they didn't like it, that they didn't understand it. It's possible that many people weren't amazed for it's lack of special effects, undressed actresses, etc. Although, Rachel Weisz is a treat all of her own, by the way, her beauty draws you passionately into the story.

This story is about love, the many times two souls shared in their short lives, fighting life's adversities, but always trying to be together. It offers a hope that life keeps on going in a cycle, the way spiritists (Kardecists) believe souls to cycle in repeating experiences for the soul's evolution.

I myself don't go to their extremes, but find God's interaction with humanity to have a purpose, one that could only be linked to our souls. Thus, a single life - the shortness, adversities and accidents - could not  be compatible with the long time a soul may require to evolve. Clearly this is wishful thinking, but to believe there is a God, one must also believe there is a purpose to His work.

The movie may be interpreted as such, or it can simply be seen as creative writing from Rachel's character Izzi. In both cases, it would be a nice story. I strongly appreciated the film for the first possibility, that such a couple met long ago and were meant to be together, but circumstances prevented that, and they were given a second chance, and possibly more, until the last man (which was the original title of the movie) dies and is charged to accompany his true love, whose soul had been bound to a tree, to someplace where all souls converge in some distant star called "Shibalba" and are cast back again for a new and refreshing start.

It really doesn't matter where or what shibalba is, as long as you see it as a temporary place, to get back again to evolve some more. I'd also recommend watching Robbin Williams and Cuba Gooding Jr.'s film "What Dreams May Come", which also regards this matter, and is also a great film that touches the heart.

I don't think we can only have one try in life - for our soul's sake, that when we die we either go to a heaven or to hell, depending on what we do. This would be a very unjust system, especially to those that die young, or those with mental illnesses that are cheated of choice and understanding, or to those that are unfortunate to be born with idiot parents or in the wrong side of the world, where the "true" religions have never been able to dominate. In the impressively ignorant world we live in, heaven would be a very lonely place.

Worse, most religions claim to know it all, to possess God's given right to spread his messages, but in truth, every single believer is nothing more than a conformist follower, the appropriate path to fanatism. Very few people really try to reason with the overwhelming religious propaganda to truly have something of their own mind - which would be another path entirely, one of enlightment and reason.

So, to appreciate this film, which may be heresy to some modern religions, is to accept the possibility that we live cycles for the benefit of our souls.

On a personal level, these movies touched me deeply, because I saw myself, or rather my wishes, in the husband characters, in the sense that I had a wife, once, that I loved very much. I felt as if that love were ageless. But now that she is gone, I would like to believe that I will find her again, in another life, where we can once more love each other, maybe loose each other once more, only to find ourselves again and again...

Self Ownership

What makes a person who he is? School and experiences alone? What is learned from the family, from childhood, from society and culture? The first two may be collected by means of reason, but the latter are introduced in an uncontrolled fashion. This post is an attempt both to answer these questions, but also to point out the danger of either learning from order or from chaos.

All men are different - this is the truth, thank God! The long-lasting lie, that all men are equal is a control system atrocity. In high-class schools they will admit this to the sons of the wealthy and powerful, but not in schools of the common and you'll never see that false idea questioned in main-stream media.

Physically, every healthy individual has pretty much the same structure, the same muscles and the same general cell count. There we do not differ much, but it is in the mind that we stand apart (and eventually our minds even make our bodies different...). Every thought as well as every experience becomes data our brains handle differently and use in very different processes.

The mind is what makes every human differ from another. This is great, to have one's own individuality, because every man's journey through life becomes one great tale of adventures. To spend a life in a stale state is to forfeit such a gift. Many people spend their lives in the comfort of fear, scared to get hurt that in the end they realize, if they're lucky, that they wasted a wonderful and precious opportunity, single within itself.

To every decision one makes, there is a process of bringing coherent knowledge (data) into reason and seeking the best possible path. Two things must be considered, first, that not making a decision, as not taking action, are both a decision and an action. Second, the best possible path is always the effect of that person's true desire, regardless if the sought 'best' outcome is positive or negative, it's just what he was willing to accept.

What makes a man himself is the sum of the data within. Therefore, it is very crucial that we understand how this data-library is formed within memory and feelings, so that we may ascertain ownership of ourselves. If we command what is inside our minds and also the processes that filter what and how all else gets in there, we hold the key for our own decisions, else we allow others to choose what we do with our lives.

Schools

School content is nominally produced and controlled by authority, therefore control over what is learned depends strictly on that government's intentions - good or bad - they suit the purpose of authority. If that government seeks to control its population in an illusive-liberty, school content will tend to be semi-technical, memorizing and unilateral (seem familiar?). On the other hand, a government whose authority is based on true liberty and real democracy will base its school content on creativity and understanding, and in reasoning most of all.

Unfortunately, we know of no government that has ever taken such a route after the unique Greeks left us. They understood about expansion of the mind through reasoning. Today, the mind has become a tool, a gadget that simply functions as just another spare (and expendable) part in a big machine. True use of the mind is to first understand one's self, followed by understanding kin and eventually all of humanity.

School systems substituted traditional family wisdom after the industrial revolution. It is noteworthy to observe that post-industrial schools were organizations intended to form the working classes that needed to be prepared for the production lines. Since then, it has been understood that the ideal worker should become accustomed to repetition, understand and follow orders and function as a part of a whole.

(For a better understanding, read the post "A Brief Story about Capitalism and Sheep") 

Experience

The second component of becoming someone, experiences are the toughest teachers, since we learn by them through adversity. Even if the subject doesn't devote enough thought on what he could learn in each case, the wonderful mind still recalls on past experiences for understanding new situations (to which they also end up understanding those previous).

Fortunately for the individual, experiences are his own, and he has at least the opportunity - if not the wits - to learn and gain from them. In any case they belong to him - little outside intervention can rob him of them.

A disciplined mind can greatly expand, especially in wisdom, just by taking some time to analyze and assimilate the lessons in each private experience - and as effective as new and valuable information, someone else's experiences that are studied and absorbed can also become good experiences.

On the other hand, if the individual doesn't give a second thought to his experiences, and neither listens to others' stories, nor spends time in studying his own thought process, he is doomed (destined) to become a mediocre individual - a member of society that is numb to everything about him.

External Influences

External influences tend to be absorbed in a disorganized manner, lacking - in many cases - purpose and truth. Such influences come from family, cultural, religious and social traditions. Typically, these external influences are imbued with superstition, misinterpretations and lies that are repeated over and over until they become truths.

There is hardly a notion or conscience of filtering this raw data that has built up since our first civilizations and that lingers still within our crowd. Since there is no control over what is being implanted in new minds of future generations, most secular beliefs and customs will keep being passed down.

External influences are cast upon the intellect in chaotic (out of control) flow regarding the self. This means that the receiver of such flow of information isn't prepared to filter such ideas by either lack of maturity, knowledge, wisdom or will.

Since our families usually seek what is best for us, they at least try to guide us in wiser paths, but family influence has lost ground to that of culture, religion and society. What good our parents may teach us, throughout our youth, looses bearing in each generation passed. This is due to the fact that modern capitalism has a different agenda for our minds than that of old family wisdom.

That wisdom had been passed down from generation to generation, but with today's endless mind-slavery processes that our societies develop, the less we can inherit from our ancestors. Someone might say that it's a good thing, since they were primitive and ignorant, but in truth, such wisdom was about being good (and knowing why), about morality, and about living and loving.

Modern wisdom (if we can call it that) is no more than rules to keep us confused, troubled and needy. These three conditions are ideal for our governing and economic systems. The more confused and lost we become, the faster we hand our free will for someone else to lead (control).

Furthermore, society is becoming needy, although very few understand what they are needy of. This is called desire of status - the irrational belief of gaining approval, respect and admiration through the ownership of commercial goods and services. No matter how poor one is, he thus becomes an easy pawn to capitalism. Being lost and needy means that society's individuals will hurry to consume all that which their neighbors crave or brag to have. In this robotic behavior we are truly becoming all equal.

Such modern wisdom blocks the mind to the 'old-fashioned family wisdom' since it's been condemned as 'conservative', 'dull' and 'out of fashion'. What imbeciles to take pride in thinking this modern society is any better than in feudal times. Why? Because while once man had a curiosity and drive to conquer the world, or to reach for the stars, to understand himself, nature and the universe, our fellow man limits his choices between channels on TV, an iPod or an iPhone, between a sedan or an SUV. These thoughts encompass his daily worries.

What will become of Man's future, if we all choose to lay back and consume every idiotic toy that capitalism puts out in stores? By the way, the term store meant a place where humans stacked supplies for the future, now stores are places destined to be depleted over and over again. This modern behavior shows how it's good - and for whom - that we become all equal by sharing the same desires, the same state of confusion and despair. Modern man has been conditioned in wishing to be equal, although for this he trades his individuality for slavery.

The Sexual Example

If in the past sex was viewed with taboos and privacy, modern society has turned it into a casual issue that is 'normal' and expected for everyone to 'master' before reaching adulthood. Nice. But the taboo's served a purpose that is now lost - the natural development of long-lasting love and relationships. We live now in an unprecedented society based on divorce.

People should be aware that divorce is a serious form of failure. Every couple that weds expects that bond to last, they make promises to do so, but reality shows that people are often getting married and divorcing as quickly as a few hours. Why is that something to be proud of? Of having utterly failed in one of the most important commitments in one's life.

What happens, in truth, is that people get involved out of status, hardly out of love or compatibility. Soon enough they find out they hardly knew the person they were married to in the first place. Society imposes that if you don’t have a girlfriend in junior-high you are a definite looser. If you don’t get married by your early twenties you're probably a homosexual or another sort of freak!

This strong influence, brought on by a harsh modern society, surpasses the obvious question - is this person I am committing to really to my liking, to my admiration and care? That would be something a conscious mind would ask itself, but no, nobody has the courage of thinking about it, because facing the fact that you're alone is far more fearful!

Thus, every kid is thinking about how to get laid before his first acnes, because society has imposed, very strongly, that you must loose your virginity or people will think badly about you. If you don’t get married before you finish college, people will say you must be queer!

Does anyone still choose to live his own way of life, regardless of what people will think about him?

Purpose to Capitalism

Capitalism's goal is to sell more every day, for its own survival and prosperity. Every single government on the planet wants control, just that. Control means power, and power means prosperity for only a few. For this political-economic system to strive it needs a cattle-minded population that will follow every lead without complaining - just as much as sheep and chicken do.

This modern society has to want to be lead, not just to accept its condition. For the good of maintaining such power, it's also very good to have the cattle deeply distracted - almost hypnotized - with simpleton ideas, trendy culture and desired gadgets. This not only keeps humans out of 'trouble' wishing for a true better life, but also keeps corporate-capitalism's machine running very smoothly, thank you!

Love, honor, human fraternity and self-awareness are being replaced by the desire for animalistic sex and the desire of status - to fit into society just like everyone else. Today they teach us we are all equal (like white mice in a giant laboratory - expendable insignificant mice). Oblivious of the concept that Man's greatest characteristic and manifestation of liberty would be that we are all very different individuals.

Today' relationships between humans are bound to the following rules:

- opposite genders must only have unfaithful and casual sexual relationships;

- same genders must be based on futile and superficial 'fun' (doesn't matter if it's about friendships or homosexual partners, it's all about futility and superficiality);

- father to sons relations must always be misunderstood and formal;

- love can only exist with your pets, or platonically towards worthless celebrities;

- and above all, there is no such thing as disinterested or selfless relationships.

Secular Traits

The last source of knowledge, so to speak, comes from our cultural inheritance. This is mostly manifested to us by our first ring of family, other kin, and about religious teachers. As with other sources, this is one with the least frame of control as to what is being absorbed by our brains - as fact, folklore, and gossip or otherwise.

Religion, which for hundreds of years had been the primal moral standard, that prevented civilization from falling into the deepest forms of barbarism, lacked reform and has lost its function as a moral beacon. Young members of society have been conditioned to see religion as they see family tradition - something of the past full of old and outdated concepts. They discard any value in either religion or family believing themselves to be smarter, wiser and independent. What casual mistake!

Every new generation steps farther apart from 'old traditions' but towards seductive moral traps of main-stream media, pop culture and society's flawed standards of desire. It’s completely losing its vital and natural parental links. Scarcely any person comes out of his adolescent phase these days without hating his parents, without being utterly alienated to pop culture, without being fully in conformity to politically correct views such as ecology; anti-smoking, but very pro-booze; selective-racial tolerant and main-stream devoted.

In modern society, especially North American, capitalist culture is dominating the entire learning/motivational thought process. The family values are being deliberately discarded. Between school and pop-culture, there is hardly any other competing source for the mind. The first controlled by government, the other by capitalism.

Pop culture, the ignorant, racist and sleazy loud music of American black movements such as rap and funk are the prime example of what capitalism is imposing on North American society - a lust for cheap vulgar sex; gratuite violence; easy money; consume and distribution of drugs and alcohol, producing one widely common type of citizen - politically and socially alienated.

You cannot blame parents that are slave to work for not having the time to spend on difficult children. You cannot blame a selfish youth for lacking respect or responsibility. You cannot blame teachers for being limited themselves, being incompetent in teaching kids to be conscientious.

The only thing that deserves blame and correction is the social and economic system we have allowed to take over. It's this system that enslaved elder generations; that cut off fruitful contact between generations; that took great measures in sifting trashy culture trends; in modeling the worse school system possible; and producing the a false politically correct code of conduct that diverts any good intention.

Being mentally dominated by this pop culture transforms man's excelling mind into a sponge to absorb a lot of data, but without the capacity to personally interact with such information. That man is dependent on fashion trends, on vulgar desires and mediocre ideas. To summarize, the individual that allows himself to become dependent, which allows others to decide for him, is a mere slave, he cannot claim self-ownership.

Any man that falls for the tricks stated above also falls into a low category of man - the conformist. As such, he cannot state that he was misguided into being so, because in truth, he chose this path, which is easier and very full of others such as himself.

There are other paths to find, to seek out, but only for the few men that choose with courage to own their decisions and their lives. The idea of self-ownership is that which the person understands most elements in his decision process, that he understands himself and goes by his choices. This man isn't scared of being wrong, of getting into trouble or being rejected by a hypocritical society, his only fear is to allow others to choose for him. That's self-ownership!

Illusions

There was a man, once, not too long ago. He lived an illusion, one inside another, and another still. There were so many illusions that he couldn’t really tell which was real. Each was a reflection of some real world he could not see – all he could do was act the best he could in each.

Of the mirror worlds, one particular seemed to be the most real to him, and this was only because it was the most painful. But what he only understood at the last moment of his life was that that specific one was the mother of all illusions.

The illusion he most cherished was one he himself fabricated, in rich velvet detail. There he was happy, loved and needed. He was wanted, creative, productive. Problems were solved with little trouble, everything good was plentiful and few were the moments he faced pain. But he knew that world wasn’t real, since it only existed in his mind.

There was another illusion in which he was a traveler, one that stayed little time in one place, because there was too much to learn, to know, to discover. This world was full of surprises and adventures, only that he could manage. He needn’t be needed, nor desired happiness, only sought knowledge – the answers to all his questions. He didn’t worry about problems because he didn’t care for them, nothing could hurt him because he only remembered the good memories, and each new day offered him something memorable, there was little or no time at all to worry about the past’s troubles.

These illusions shared the man’s reality, among others, but he always returned to that specific one that brought him constant pain, the one he thought was the real reality, really. Nothing seemed right, nothing seemed to work for him, nobody cared for him the way he wanted, he wasn’t loved nor understood, only felt pain.

Every waking moment he desired the other illusions to become reality, while he wished freedom from that specific illusion. Time went on, never halting – although there was a certain illusion in which he could control time – it seemed the days of trouble would never end, until he felt necessary to intervene and end those days of pain. He took his life, jumping from a high ledge to become a red spot many, many stories bellow.

But in that last moment, actually only a few meters from the ground, he realized that it had been another illusion, among all – and the only reality was the one he made. Choosing his fate and acting upon it was reality. And he learned this as he saw himself in the painful world falling from a high building; and he saw himself in the happy-loved world falling from a ski slope onto the rocks bellow at a luxurious mountain resort; and also saw himself in the adventurous world falling from a ruptured parachute.

As he fell, he most certainly left the real world to a better place – if that's not just another illusion.

Manipulation and Girly Vampires

The new trend of vampire movies has proved, once more, the tremendous influence pop culture has on our youth. Our society is living a new ugly era of mind control that, inspired by Hitler himself, help capitalism sell just about anything without any opposing barrier such as free will or personal choice.


The vampire myths began somewhere in the tenth or twelfth century as stories to scare children, and probably to disgrace bad rulers. These stories spread all over Europe, until Bram Stoker wrote the famous novel Dracula. The main character was such an evil ruler that the devil himself granted him eternal life.

Bram Stoker inspired many other books and movies, all respecting the main idea – that God punished an evil man and/or the devil gifted him powers and eternal life. But in the past ten to fifteen years, a gay and merry RPG (role playing game) was published with a new kind of vampire society – Vampire Masquerade. To make the game playable, it introduced a bunch of new behaviors to these vampires that many became pseudo-aristocrats that cherished life, mingled with humans and conducted all sorts of schemes, but always remained hidden from the general public.

In most cases, these vampires were still powerful blood-sucking monsters, but they were also good elegant, rich, gay and even protectors of mankind. Thus, changing completely the evil-grim stereotype vampires once had in medieval to classical literature.

In these few years, the vampire cult has turned from a silly almost theatrical game into a new market and sub-culture. Vampire movies today bring a vulnerable, cute, very feminine kind of vampire. These fragile-looking girly vampires have become quite humane, friendly and goody heroes, and the public love them and wish to be bitten to become them.

What’s the problem? Just what’s in our faces. If culture manipulators, in the interest of capitalism, can change a very evil character from fiction into a lovable and desired hero, in just a few years of marketing, then any other belief can also be manipulated and changed to someone else’s wishes.

If today North Americans foster a deep hatred for Obama bin Laden, for arab terrorists, for whatever, such strong manipulation could have their children loving him and his crazy friends. If some new religion were to gain the marketing manipulators’ support, within a few years they could turn a new and controversial faith into an official and mandatory religion.

And just for all to know, many of these new religions (less than 50 years old) are investing heavily on television, radio, internet and other media. In recent years they marketed several fanatically religious movies. If the vampire stories were transformed from evil to good in such few years, rest assured that any of these doubtful and manipulative religions are seeking the same benefits.

Wise up! Society is divided in three very distinctive kinds of people – conformists (75%), manipulators (20%), and responders (5%). Within the main group, the conformists, a few are extracted by the manipulators and transformed into fanatics. The responders act, within their possibilities, against noticed abuses by manipulators and fanatics. Manipulators are those that cheat, lie, bribe and deceit to gain selfish benefits. The responders remain dormant until they perceive some wrong and their stronger characters compel them to act in the benefit of others. It’s been lack of responders that the world got in the shape its in.

There is no hope for expecting any conformists to act on themselves. If responders don’t answer their call, no one will. While religious, corporate or political manipulators act daily on their behalf and personal gain, the grand majority just sits through life letting it all happen – especially because they feel untouched by certain problems, if they’re ever aware of them anyway. They are happy as long as the see evil on their neighbors’ lawn, not their own. The great virtue of the responders is that they feel even when it’s just in their neighbors’ turf.

The conformist is a soulless character, he goes by his life in a very stagnant pace, only thinking of himself, and doesn’t take any part in other people’s problems. Worse, he thinks himself as being on some good side – although they are eternally neutral, to say the least. Society, also, is very much conformist and rewards noninvolvement through comfort in a curtain of politically correct (a future post).

Be very sure this blogger is a responder, what are you?

Alien Controversy

Recently, Stephen Hawkins stated an interesting view regarding a possible alien attitude if ever finding earth. He warned an alien race could actually be a threat to mankind, rather than the friendly world visitor many people wishfully believe. He has ever since been criticized and even called crazy. He may still be regarded as a genious, but a crazy one.

Sign me up in that list as well, the crazy part. First, there is a great possibility that there are other planets with life, since the same laws of physics and chemistry apply everywhere else in the universe. The biology may be a lot different, since factors such as element abundance, gravity, sun light, climate, energy sources and so forth will surely vary in each 'ecosystem'. But life is plausible in many planets and moons - it is even plausible to develop in the void of space.

If anyone starts to put God into this equasion, for argument's sake, all religions agree that he made the universe - some say it was in seven days, others may state it was instantly in a flash (although it really doesn't matter). Furthermore, it would be interesting to ignore any atheist, since they don't even have an answer to what created the universe, or what (or who) caused the big bang - at some point something out there created something that started a chain reaction that put you here reading this blog.

A very cynical and idiodic atheist may attempt to say God didn't create life on earth, that it came from outer space, but it doesn't solve the puzzle, since they forget to explain what created that life in space. As soon as the universe began, so did all laws of nature. Therefore, let's just assume God created the laws of physics and chemistry, sat back and relaxed for a few billion years and the rest has been his intervention.

One more thing, it's incredible that many humans are sure there is a God, but doubt his purpose, doubt his laws to 'function' in the rest of the universe. It is agreable to think there was much intervention to prepare the earth so that it could create and nurture life, especially since there were many requirements for our fragile biological structures to ever evolve.

First the planet needed to solidify, become stable, sift the heavy elements deep in the earth, have our precious carbon available in the air, in the water and in the soil. Water, also, was essential. Then, some smaller planet had to crash into the earth to form our moon, that not only gave movement to our oceans, but much more important shifted earth's alignment in an angle that produced our four seasons and avoided the sun from burning earth's crust and atmosphere.

Colossal preparations were needed in order to allow simple single-cell life forms to evolve. So much more happened on earth for man and his religions. Write about God’s interventions on earth would take thousands, and much more to discuss the almost-impossible steps for earth biology to produce the human race.


A single race that has developed thought and reason, in the entire planet! Human development completely stands out from any other life form, with incomparable functions that are still being discovered.

Therefore, once again, the laws governing the universe are there, but God’s intervention had to be the most important element in building mankind. To believe in a God is to believe his intervention all the way from astral bodies forming our solar system to your eyes seeing this text and your mind understanding it.

To understand the infinite complexity of man, the infinite coinciding events that let to develop mankind, it can only lead to believe in a God with a purpose. So, back to the alien situation, it would simply be up to God to chose if he intervened elsewhere to produce other sentient beings.

One would then say ‘but if God made other species in the universe, he would also prevent them from bringing harm to our planet’. Unfortunately, an apparent rule he also set is mankind’s free will. If we have it, so should any other intelligent race.

As mentioned in Hawkins’ discussions throughout the internet, an alien invasion to earth would be like the European colonization in the New World, that enslaved and overrun the native Indians. The Europeans chose to take the American continents for themselves, no supernatural force intervened such invasion, why would any intervene in earth’s invasion.

If an alien civilization had the technology to come to our solar system, why would they be friendly, and why would they be hostile. Obviously, an arriving alien race would be far advanced technologically, but not necessarily in all fields other than long-distance space travel.

Hopefully, a friendly visit would be oriented in:

• scientific purposes – study other intelligent species (biology, history or technology), study other life forms (biologically, genetically);
• economic purposes – examine trade possibilities of labor (art or technology), resources (depleted or rare elements, biology, ), intergalactic services (docking, fueling, maintenance, alliances, etc.);

Despairingly, a hostile threat would be oriented in:

• economic purposes – take, by stealth or force, all of the above;
• military purposes – fear humans as a future threat; require human manpower in their intergalactic expansion plans; invade and adapt earth for their environment;

The obvious differences are that in a friendly visit, one would expect cooperation, diplomacy and communication – and would begin with a friendly gesture like saying hello worldwide. While in a hostile situation, the expected course would be stealth, immediate attack and annihilation.

Judging by the intense UFO sightings over the past 3 decades, the first clue to their intentions lies in these covert operations. Never has an alien ship docked in a large urban city and held out a healthy press meeting – every single sighting has been by afar, near energy or chemical sources. And they disappear as quickly as they appeared.

Also, there is the issue of abductions. If they are true, to what purpose would someone be taken without consent, meddled with, hurt, manipulated and then some be brought back. There are also reproduction reports that can only mean one thing – in some way, they wish to plant agents within our society and government.

The scale, unfortunately and despairingly, tends to a hostile purpose, as Hawkins’ warning. There are no reasons for their stealthy incursions, if there were of any friendly purposes. If they were studying our world, surely they could share our own findings of ourselves and our environment, which would be alien – and possibly incomprehensible – to them.

Even for a seemingly peaceful approach, humanity should be cautions and act accordingly. As a bad example, NASA's selfish act of sending a module into space containing our DNA code, along with a whole lot of information could serve better for a military operation against us than any imbecile attempt to share happy thought about us.

We have no condition yet to describe how any vessel could reach us from the far reaches of space, but in any case, it would be quite reasonable to state that such effort would be somewhat costly in time, resources and lives. Therefore, it would be safe to assume they took off from their homeworld with purpose – an expensive one – and someone will have to pay that bill.